Let’s be honest. Being a developer ruins you. You can no longer just use a piece of software. You see the sloppy code, the lazy architecture, the security holes you could drive a truck through. You see the dumpster fire burning behind the slick UI.

But the real curse kicks in when that X-ray vision escapes your IDE and you start looking at the world. At society. At the State. And you realize it’s the biggest, oldest, most profitable and poorly written legacy project of all time.

This isn’t a political post. This is a bug report.

 

The Architecture of Deception

Before we get to the users, look at the architecture. It’s a monolith held together by centuries of unaddressed technical debt. The codebase (the law) is an incomprehensible mess of spaghetti, where functions written in 1925 still have critical dependencies. No one dares refactor it.

 

Good luck trying to get a straight answer on how anything works. The API docs are a black box by design. The bureaucracy is a web of infinite loops and undocumented endpoints, designed to make you give up. And you can’t just switch to a competitor. This system has the ultimate vendor lock-in.

 

Case Study: The Highway API

To see the malicious design in action, let’s zoom in on a single feature. A friend of mine came up with this analogy, and it’s too perfect not to share.

Let’s say you, the user, want a new highway.

1. The POST /highways Endpoint: The feature is built. This operation is funded by a mandatory, non-refundable debit from your tax_account. You pay, in full, for the development and deployment of the asset.
2. The GET /highways/{id}/drive Endpoint: Now you try to use the feature you just paid for. Access Denied. This endpoint requires a separate, paid vignette_token for authorization. You are now paying a subscription fee to use the asset you already own. It’s a classic double-dip.
3. The PATCH /highways/{id}/repair Endpoint: The highway gets worn out. A repair operation is triggered. The cost? You guessed it. Another debit from your tax_account.

The logic is as brutal as it is brilliant: profits are privatized, while costs are socialized. It’s the perfect scam. You finance the asset, you pay to maintain it, and the system’s admins collect a fee for its usage.

 

The Admins with Root Access

So, who benefits from this convoluted, user-unfriendly system? Who are the “distinguished gentlemen” running the show? In our analogy, they are the Product Managers with root access to the production server.

They design features not for your benefit, but for one KPI: their own profit. They deploy changes without a single line of code review, and they bear zero responsibility for the bugs that affect the userbase. The revenue they extract funds a reality that is a universe away from yours.

But the perks of being an admin are not what you think. It’s not just about the hypercars or the legendary debauchery of bathing prostitutes in expensive champagne. That’s merely a symptom. The real “C-level perk,” the core function of all this excess, is about creating unbreakable loyalty and control.

It’s about initiation.

Places like Epstein’s island weren’t just playgrounds; they were initiation rituals for the highest echelons of power. They were filtering mechanisms, designed to bind the “distinguished gentlemen” together through shared, unforgivable acts. It’s the ultimate blood oath for the digital age: a cryptographic key to the inner circle, granted only after you’ve created a permanent, undeletable record of your own damnation. Once you’re initiated, you can never leave. You can never talk. You will protect the system because the system owns your soul.

 

Why Do Users Defend This Mess?

This is the hardest bug to comprehend. Why do the end-users—the people being exploited—fiercely defend the system? It’s not because they’re stupid. It’s a masterclass in psychological engineering.

1. The Shiny Frontend: The system is wrapped in a beautiful UI of “National Pride,” “Security,” and “Our Great Heritage.” People fall in love with the marketing, the logo, the brand. They don’t want to know that the backend is a tire fire.
2. Fear of Downtime: The admins constantly push one message: “Yes, our system is flawed, but the alternative is chaos!” People prefer the familiar pain of a buggy app to the terrifying uncertainty of a full migration. Better the devil you know.
3. Misdirected Bug Reports: Why is your life hard? The system tells you the problem isn’t the OS itself. The problem, they insist, is that other user—the immigrant, the political opponent, the person on welfare, the foreign agent, the ‘unpatriotic’ intellectual who criticizes us, the previous administration that screwed everything up, a different generation that doesn’t understand—who is crashing the server and ruining the experience for everyone else.

 

Conclusion: Stop Being a User

Where does that leave us—the ones who see the code?

It leaves us with a choice. File bug reports that get marked “Won’t Fix,” or change your mindset.

Don’t just click “I Agree.” Read the source. Debug the news. Treat every political statement like a pull request hiding malicious code. Understand the incentives behind every new law.

You don’t need to burn the system down—you just need to stop letting it run you. That’s when you hit true flow. When you stop being a resource and start running your own code—on your terms.

And maybe… bugs aren’t mistakes. Maybe they’re features of a larger, broken system called society.

 

Follow the Vibe